Saturday, July 28, 2007

Start Here!

Your input to the topics on the site is welcome.

Click on the links to take you to the topics:

Contact: Joe Ridyard by e-mail at joseph@ridyard1X.freeserve.co.uk To contact me type in the e-mail and omit the X. This stops automated spammers from inundating my mail box.

or phone 01925 767187

Thursday, July 26, 2007

EBU Strategy document

The EBU has published a new Strategy Document on which it invites comments.

It can be found here:


http://www.ebu.co.uk/publications/Official%20Documents/Shareholders%20Strategy%20Document.pdf

The first thing to say is that my club and almost all of its members do not subscribe to the EBU and have not done so for a number of years. They are not interested in Masterpoints and do not use any of the other EBU services. This does make me feel guilty as I recognise the EBU plays an important rule especially in respect of the rules of the game. We do, however, purchase their handbooks and so support them in that way.

The first key feature of the new strategy is to abolish annual subscriptions and replace them by a 'pay to play' scheme (P2P). This is likely to involve each player playing an additional 30p table money each time they play at their club.

Additionally, any club member who is not a current EBU member will pay a 'one-off' fee of £5 to join.

This will mean the following for my club. We play twice a week averaging around 5 tables. That means P2P will cost around £12 per week. This will give the EBU around £600 per year from us. The 'one off' subscription for around 50 members will give them a further £250. There will also be a minimum annual affiliation fee of £50 plus an extra £25 for each additional duplicate session, so, in our case, £75.

For an 'average' member playing around 4o times per year, the P2P cost will be £12 but this will obviously vary a lot from member to member.

What are we to receive for this?


  • Free rating software. Explained with a complete lack of clarity so can't say what it means.
  • Free scoring program (we already have paid a 'one-off' fee for our own).
  • Free web site hosting (we pay around £40 annually for this).
  • Free electronic newsletter (big deal!)
  • Free access to online club committee forum. (wow!)
  • Free exclusive on-line club night one night a week (well maybe)
  • Free club directors handbook
  • Free club managers handbook
  • Free services of club liaison officer
  • Free computer deals and hand records (possibly)
  • Free club constitution (already available)
  • Club insurance discounts (not needed)
  • Bridge Shop discount (buy from Mr Bridge)
  • Discounts on club director training (not likely to use)

Alan Chapman wrote on 11/04/08:

"Having been a vociferous opponent of the EBU's policy for change I feel I should record my change of view.I have to acknowledge the EBU's willingness to alter its proposals in the face of considerable opposition (some might say they had no choice!), in particular dropping the one-off £5 fee for new members.Appreciating a lot of Clubs are still uncomfortable and are considering dropping their EBU affiliation, may I urge them to reconsider.Yes, the EBU will still have to make strides to be more open and adopt a degree of democracy, but will the game of Bridge be better or worse off if we lose it altogether?As to the cost: it should be cheaper for existing EBU members. Non-members will have to pay 30-50p extra each time they play - hardly a fortune. Surely this would be a small price to pay for retaining an umbrella organisation and to have the chance to demand that it takes more notice of ordinary Club members in the future.Alan Chapman, Marlborough, Wiltshire."

Monday, March 05, 2007

EDU The English Domino Union

When I used to occasionally frequent public houses, I was partial to the odd game of dominoes. It was always a friendly relaxed affair often played in a special room called the 'snug' , devoted to this and other games such as darts or cribbage.

One played with whoever might be in the room at the time and impromptu competitions were often organised. The rules were simple and everyone had a good time. Sometimes there were even competitions between different pubs and leagues were formed.

Imagine the scene in your local when the landlord approaches the players with the following. "Now lads I have some news for you! This pub is a member of the English Domino Union and we pay them an annual subscription for a whole range of services to benefit you and all domino players. For example part of the subscription sends the English Domino team on its world tour. Marvellous! I have really exciting news -the EDU needs more money so that funds can be made available for the development of the game. They have decided that all domino players should be members of the EDU so that new players can be attracted into the pubs. I know this will excite you all and you will be along soon to fill in your direct debits"

Questions

A Is the average social Bridge player very different from the average domino player in his/her attitude to an enjoyable pastime?

B Will the average Bridge player react to the EBUs latest policy statement in a similar way to that than can be envisaged for the average domino player!

C Has the EBU finally lost its collective marbles?

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Bridge and the Law!

Did you ever imagine that Bridge clubs could fall foul of the law on gambling?

With the nanny state anything is possible!

Here is an e-mail that arrived (unsolicited) today.


GAMBLING ACT 2005: GAMING IN CLUBS AND ON ALCOHOL-LICENSED PREMISES


This e-mail is to bring to your attention the above consultation covering proposals for regulations under the Gambling Act 2005, some of which have a bearing on the activities of bridge and whist clubs. The consultation document can be found via the link below, and I should be grateful if you could bring it to the attention of any organisations, publications or individuals who you consider may have an interest. If you are aware of any bridge clubs that operate on a commercial basis it would be particularly helpful if they could be made aware of this consultation.The closing date for responses is 20 April 2007, but in the meantime if any clarification is needed or you feel that I can otherwise be of assistance please feel free to contact me.

Dave Bawden Gambling Act Implementation Team 5th Floor Department for Culture Media and Sport 2-4 Cockspur Street London SW1Y 5DH


http://www.culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/Gambling_racing/QuickLinks/Consultations


I have had a go at reading the 'consultation document' but soon had to go and lie down in a darkened room! While I think we are safe from the knock on the door in the early hours (for now) , I will try to read up on this and post more later.

Are you worried?!

Friday, January 12, 2007

Pyschic dilemma!

What are the ethical limits of psychic bidding?

Here is a classic case of judgement about that issue from a hand I played on the internet. My partner was obviously a very new player graded at the lowest level of ability. The opponents were a regular partnership both graded at the highest level.

I picked up this hand:

AJ964
KQ72
A4
KQ

My right hand opponent opened 3 diamonds and I doubled for take out. Left hand opponent bid 4 spades which was passed round to me. Thinking he could have all the remaining spades I decided to pass.

The hand was played in 4S not doubled and not vulnerable and made 1 trick.

This is 9 down for -450.

This is the hand held by the four spade bidder!

10
A95
9753
96543

We can easily make a vulnerable six spades and get a very poor score.

My reaction to the 4 spade bid is a mixture of admiration and contempt!

I can see the bidder thought that six spades must be easily on as his partner bidding pre-emptively in diamonds would be unlikely to have either many points or many spades. Therefore he bids 4s himself to mislead the opposition.

This is indeed very clever and astute thinking. My question is whether or not it is ethical or in the spirit of the game for an experienced and able pair to bid in this way against a newcomer!

I think it would not encourage someone to continue playing if they meet this kind of thing in their early Bridge life.

I did report this as a psychic bid and the adjudicator said the 4 spade bid was probably a misclick! This was not true as the opponents said it was a psyche.

What is your opinion?